12/27/2022 0 Comments Reactivityĭonatello S, Tyrer M, Cheeseman CR (2010) Comparison of test methods to assess pozzolanic activity. J Test Eval 44(6):2147–2154Īntoni M, Rossen J, Martirena F, Scrivener K (2012) Cement substitution by a combination of metakaolin and limestone. Helsel MA, Ferraris CF, Bentz D (2015) Comparative study of methods to measure the density of Cementitious powders. Kocaba V, Gallucci E, Scrivener KL (2012) Methods for determination of degree of reaction of slag in blended cement pastes. ĭurdziński PT, Ben Haha M, Bernal SA, De Belie N, Gruyaert E, Lothenbach B, Menéndez Méndez E, Provis JL, Schöler A, Stabler C, Tan Z, Villagrán Zaccardi Y, Vollpracht A, Winnefeld F, Zając M, Scrivener KL (2017) Outcomes of the RILEM round robin on degree of reaction of slag and fly ash in blended cements. Suraneni P, Weiss J (2017) Examining the pozzolanicity of supplementary cementitious materials using isothermal calorimetry and thermogravimetric analysis. Īvet F, Snellings R, Alujas Diaz A, Ben Haha M, Scrivener K (2016) Development of a new rapid, relevant and reliable ( R 3) test method to evaluate the pozzolanic reactivity of calcined kaolinitic clays. Scrivener KL, Lothenbach B, De Belie N, Gruyaert E, Skibsted J, Snellings R, Vollpracht A (2015) TC 238-SCM: hydration and microstructure of concrete with SCMs State of the art on methods to determine degree of reaction of SCMs. Lothenbach B, Scrivener K, Hooton RD (2011) Supplementary cementitious materials. Snellings R, Scrivener K (2015) Rapid screening tests for supplementary cementitious materials: past and future. In: Proceedings of 7e congrés international de la chimie des ciments, Paris, pp 6–41įrattini N (1949) Richerche sulla calce di idrolisi nelle paste di cimento. Raverdy M, Brivot F, Paillère A, Bron R (1980) Appréciation de l’activité pouzzolanique de constituents secondaires. Acceleration and improvement of the reproducibility of the IS 1727 test will be attempted as well.Ĭhapelle J (1958) Attaque sulfocalcique des laitiers et pouzzolanes. The TC 267-TRM will pursue the development of test protocols based on the R 3 model systems. However, the Frattini test, Chapelle and modified Chapelle test showed poor interlaboratory reproducibility, demonstrating experimental difficulties. The current standardized tests did not show acceptable correlations across all SCMs, although they performed better when latently hydraulic materials (blast furnace slag) were excluded. Later age (90 days) strength results also correlated well with the results of the IS 1727 (Indian standard) reactivity test, an accelerated strength test using an SCM/Ca(OH) 2-based model system. The use of this simplified model system isolates the reaction of the SCM and the reactivity can be easily quantified from the heat release or bound water content. The methods that showed the best reproducibility and gave good correlations used the R 3 model system of the SCM and Ca(OH) 2, supplemented with alkali sulfate/carbonate. It was found that only a few test methods showed acceptable correlation to the 28 days relative strength over the whole range of SCMs. The methods were evaluated based on the correlation to the 28 days relative compressive strength of standard mortar bars containing 30% of SCM as cement replacement and the interlaboratory reproducibility of the test results. To this purpose, a round robin campaign was organized to investigate 10 different tests for reactivity and 11 SCMs covering the main classes of materials in use, such as granulated blast furnace slag, fly ash, natural pozzolan and calcined clays. Now there's your explosion.A primary aim of RILEM TC 267-TRM: “Tests for Reactivity of Supplementary Cementitious Materials (SCMs)” is to compare and evaluate the performance of conventional and novel SCM reactivity test methods across a wide range of SCMs. For example, in a solution of copper sulfate in water, a piece of iron quickly becomes coated with copper as the iron displaces copper from the solution because iron is more active. Activity is an ordered series, showing which element will replace another element.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |